A comparison of computerized classification testing and computerized adaptive testing in clinical psychology

Authors

  • Niels Smits Faculty of Psychology and Education
  • Matthew D. Finkelman Tufts University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7333/jcat.v1i2.27

Abstract

The appropriateness of computerized classification testing (CCT) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) as methods for efficient administration of self-report questionnaires in clinical psychology are compared, when classification is an important test goal. Simulated data sets were used to compare the two methods and to study the effect of latent trait distributions and number of items administered on the quality of clinical measurements and decisions. CAT and CCT outcomes were very similar. The implications of these findings for assessment in clinical psychology are discussed.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2013-02-08

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1-5 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in JCAT agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
  2. Articles may be copied and reproduced for academic and research purposes with no cost.
  3. All other reproduction requires permission of the author(s).
  4. If the authors cannot be contacted, permission can be requested from IACAT.
  5. Authors may enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JCAT.